In the “There’s a First Time for Everything” category, an unusual news item.
A young man, accused of a random, possibly gang-related, shooting in Baltimore, MD is using the GPS tracking report from his court-ordered home monitoring device as an alibi.
Lamont Davis, 17, is behind bars, accused of the July 4 shooting of a 5-year-old girl and her female teenaged cousin. Raven Wyatt was shot in the head and her cousin (who was only identified by the name “Reds) was shot in the arm with stray bullets as they were walking one afternoon on South Pulaski Street. The two survived.
A blue light surveillance camera, set by police at strategically-placed high crime parts of the city, captured some grainy footage of the shooter. Witnesses identified the male figure as Davis.
However, the accused, whose trial is now underway in Baltimore Circuit Court, claims he was home at the time of the crime and submits his GPS tracking records as evidence. The tracking system report does record the GPS receiver at his home address at the time of the crime.
But a GPS expert in law enforcement and one in the consumer manufacturing industry dispute the criminal’s claim. They say the GPS tracker was at home at the time of the shooting, but Davis was not. He allegedly slipped off the ankle bracelet committed the crime and returned home later to put it back on.
Davis, while though only 17 years old, could be considered a career criminal. He has been arrested more than 15 times as a juvenile. At the time of the crime, he was on house arrest, out of detention for assaulting a teenage girl, and ordered to wear an ankle GPS tracking device.
Both the prosecuting and defense attorneys agree on one thing in this case. Davis was good at slipping out of the GPS tracking anklet. He was caught by a probation officer “not where he was supposed to be” on about 100 occasions in the month’s time he was on house arrest.
It is uncertain if Davis will get off, but it is obvious that state authorities have to admit the GPS tracking system they had on Davis’ ankle was flawed.
Points made in court at the trial:
- The GPS tracking and monitoring company, based in state in Nebraska, is supposed to report all violations to Maryland State, but they don’t always do it.
- Criminals have nothing better to do than figure out how to outsmart the system. They then tell companions in crime. The end result is some people are masters at escape.
- The GPS tracking device can’t relay GPS tracking data if it is out of range of a transmitter.
GPS tracking systems were originally designed for vehicle tracking. They are very effective and location readings are accurate within a few feet. But technology advances very quickly, and in this case, the courts in Maryland might be relying on an older model system.
Sources: The Baltimore Sun , WJZ13
»crosslinked«